Posted by Snowman on October 09, 2001 at 12:34:01:
In Reply to: the ramifications of this thing posted by Sentient on October 09, 2001 at 05:27:30:
: the heightened arousal is maintained in light of the knowledge of the other as being either oblivious to or "knowing about" this fact in the fetish's consciousness: that she does all of it, the dangling, the dipping, the heelpopping, and every other little peculiar look, and every little peculiar movement, and every peculiar tone of voice, she does all of this "for me". she exists "for" this thing, this hidden passion, this subtle game, for how else does she exist. The objectification is inescapable, but not in totality to become only the part, to become only "these feet", "these shoes", "these red toenails", "these reinforced-toes". If he desires the candid glance he will require her to be a consciousness wholly attuned to his peculiar needs, yet obliviously, and for that only will he love her. Hence the face and the eyes into which he transmits his being. Did I come in during the middle of the program or something? If there is more to this line of thought, I wouldn't mind reading about it. Snowman